![]() 2017 31(5):1192–7.ĭe Oliveira JJ, de Silva AS, Baganha RJ, Barbosa CGR, de Silva JAO, de Dias RM, Oliveira LHS, Pereira AA, Ribeiro AGSV, Pertille A. Acute effects of eccentric overload on concentric front squat performance. Munger CN, Archer DC, Leyva WD, Wong MA, Coburn JW, Costa PB, Brown LE. The effects of exercise selection and rest interval on postactivation potentiation of vertical jump performance. Acute effects of jumping and sprinting on hammer throwing performance. Karampatsos BG, Terzis G, Polychroniou C, Georgiadis G. Effect of heavy dynamic resistive exercise on acute upper-body power. Effect of different rest intervals after whole-body vibration on vertical jump performance. Nonlocalized postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE) effects in trained athletes: a pilot study. 2003 17(4):671–7.Ĭuenca-Fernández F, Smith IC, Jordan MJ, MacIntosh BR, López-Contreras G, Arellano R, Herzog W. Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals. 2001 4(3):1–21.Ĭhiu LZ, Fry AC, Weiss LW, Schilling BK, Brown LE, Smith SL. ![]() American Society of Exercise Physiologists (ASEP) procedures recommendations for the accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. Effect of post-activation potentiation in athletics: a systematic review. ![]() 2004 18(2):365–72.īorba DDA, Ferreira-Júnior JB, Santos LAD, Carmo MCD, Coelho LGM. Conflicting effects of fatigue and potentiation on voluntary force. 2016 4(2):22.īehm DG, Button DC, Barbour G, Butt JC, Young WB. The acute effects of heavy deadlifts on vertical jump performance in men. Effect of hang cleans or squats paired with countermovement vertical jumps on vertical displacement. Therefore, recommendations for future studies could include utilizing a more elite population and to ensure all potential participants can squat at least 2 × their body weight.Īndrews TR, Mackey T, Inkrott TA, Murray SR, Clark IE, Pettitt RW. The findings of this study are in partial agreement with previous literature where the warm-up was probably enough to elicit PAP. The “best” values were significantly ( P < 0.05) greater than baseline values (peak power: experimental = 1354.76 ± 521.24 W vs. However, there was a significant main effect for time ( P < 0.05) for all variables. There was no interaction or main effect for condition ( P > 0.05). Multiple 2 × 8 repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyze the data along with a paired samples t test between baseline and “best” values. A linear position transducer was used to collect peak power, peak velocity, and displacement of the barbell during the clean. The testing condition was performed and additional measurements were taken at 30 s, 2 min, 4 min, 6 min, 8 min, 10 min, and 12 min into recovery. Baseline measurements were taken following the warm-up. MethodsĮleven volunteers who engaged in weightlifting (Male = 5, Female = 6) participated in two different testing sessions (experimental vs. The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of a conditioning activity (clean high pulls) on the performance of a main activity (clean) after the conditioning activity. The concept of post-activation potentiation (PAP) is still novel from a training perspective and lacks breadth relative to weightlifting exercises.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |